Software Verification in the Age of Coding Agents

Software Verification in the Age of Coding Agents

Software testing is widely understood as essential to building reliable systems, and it’s one of the hardest things to get right. A fundamental issue is that tests are good at confirming the behavior a team expects, but the most damaging failures tend to hide in the edge cases no one thought to check during development. Those blind spots are only growing as AI produces more code that no human has closely reviewed.

Antithesis is a software verification company built around an approach called deterministic simulation testing. The platform runs a customer’s software in a fully controlled environment, exploring thousands of different paths through it at runtime. Crucially, the paths aren’t pre-specified and they’re not merely the expected cases. In this way, it can surface rare, damaging bugs that normal testing would never catch.

Carl Sverre is on the Red Team at Antithesis and he also leads much of the company’s AI strategy. In this episode, Carl joins Sean Falconer to discuss the Antithesis approach to software verification, why reliability tooling has been chronically underinvested, what makes stateful and distributed systems so hard to test, how deterministic simulation testing works under the hood, and much more.

Full Disclosure: This episode is sponsored by Antithesis

Sponsorship inquiries:
sponsor@softwareengineeringdaily.com

Sean Falconer

Sean Falconer is the Head of AI at Confluent where he leads the AI product team, responsible for creating Confluent Intelligence, the company’s platform for building real-time, context-aware AI systems. In prior roles, Sean’s been an academic, startup founder, and Googler. He has published works covering a wide range of topics from AI to quantum computing. You can connect with Sean on LinkedIn.

Subscribe
to the newsletter

Subscribe to the Software Engineering Daily newsletter for a curated look at the best and newest from the software engineering community.